The US does not want 'gas to be turned off in the middle of winter when a political crisis erupts', Sondland stated at the time.ДЇor this, the project is seen as competition. In November 2018, the former US ambassador to the EU Gordon Sondland warned that 'dependence on Russian gas for Europe is geopolitically wrong'. In the European Commission's view, the Nord Stream 2 project does not contribute to the Energy Union's objectives of opening up new supply sources, routes, and suppliers, it says.ДЄnd Washington fears Russia could use gas supplies as a political weapon.

The pipeline should 'not be operated in a legal vacuum or exclusively under the law of a third country'.

In a statement from June 2017, it says that Nord Stream 2 does not contribute to the goals of the Energy Union. The view from BrusselsД«russels does not support the pipeline. According to the operating company, this could supply 26 million households. About 55 billion cubic metres of gas are to be delivered from Russia to Germany through the Baltic Sea every year. Moscow would benefit from this, as it could sell its gas, which would bring financial returns. The pipeline would be a relatively cheap way to obtain the raw material and cover the country's energy needs. In principle, Germany relies on Russian gas, considered to be a transition fuel in the green transition. The Greens, for example, reject the project for geostrategic and climate policy reasons. Clearly, Russia and Germany both support the project, but in Berlin, especially against the backdrop of the newly formed government consisting of three different parties, there have repeatedly been different views on whether and when Nord Stream 2 should be launched.

State property 2 german stream